YouMass
  Current User:
  MASTEP GUEST
 
Stormwater Technologies Clearinghouse
Project Information Stormwater Library The Database External Links Contact
Log Off |Registration | Forgot Password | Home Page

Rain Garden Bioretention LID - Haddam Connecticut :: A product from LID - NON-PROPRIETARY ::
General Information
Find information on the BMP type, applications and pollutants treated
Cost
Per unit, CFS, and/or lb of pollutant removed
Design Considerations
Installation and maintenance requirements, design methodology, setbacks, capacities, etc.
Site and Environmental Considerations
Storm types, drainage area, soil types, infiltration rate, residuals, secondary impacts, etc.
Performance Evaluation
Summary table of test status, our rating, links to more detailed information, list of test reports
MASTEP Evaluation Summary
This product was evaluated in at least one third-party study. See MASTEP Evaluation Summary.
In Brief:
Two rain gardens were constructed in CT according to the specifications in the Prince George’s County MD design manual. They were sited to each be able to capture and treat the first 0.5 inches of roof runoff, making the total capacity 1”. Each rain garden was lined with plastic to be able to collect all the infiltrated runoff. Perforated PVC pipe was installed at the bottom of the garden to collect the water and was surrounded with stone. Native soil (loamy sand) filled the rest of the garden and then it was topped with a 5cm layer of mulch. Native vegetation including chokeberry (Aronia prunifolia), winterberry (Ilex verticillata) and compact inkberry( Ilex glabra compacta)was planted in each garden. Garden 1 was 84.4% sand, 7.6% silt, 8.0% clay with an infiltration capacity of 12.6cm/hr. Garden 2 was 83.6% sand, 10% silt, 6.4% clay with an infiltration capacity of 10.3cm/hr.

Return to the Home Page
© 2004 University of Massachusetts Amherst. Site Policies. This site is maintained by MaSTEP. Comments to: webmaster.